TV Watch Statement on Government's Role in Controlling What's on TV

President Bush signs broadcast indecency bill into law, but is that what Americans really want?

June 15, 2006

When the FCC slapped local broadcasters with a record $3.5 million in fines this March, it said it was reacting in part to an increase in public complaints about broadcast television. But a closer look at the pattern of complaints the FCC receives shows that the vast majority of individuals file complaints at the prompting of just two special interest groups, and complainants often admit they didn’t watch the episode in question.

TV Watch Executive Director Jim Dyke released this statement today:

“Those who cite ‘massive’ complaints about what’s on TV as a way of justifying increased government intervention should be extremely concerned. The government’s own data show that the vast majority of complaints come from a handful of people encouraged by activists to complain about these shows, and not the viewers themselves. The disparity between the millions who tune in and the few complainants is further evidence that Americans do not believe the government should control what they watch on TV.” For example: How 4,211 e-mails led to a record $3.5 million in fines against local broadcasters (1)

  • More than 98 percent of the government-released emails about Without a Trace (CBS) were identical versions of the form complaints created by the Parents Television Council (PTC) and the American Family Association (AFA).

  • Not a single one of the 4,211 government-released complaints against Without a Trace was submitted until nearly two weeks after the episode aired – an episode watched by 8.2 million Americans. Only when the PTC and AFA issued “e-alerts” asking members to forward a prepared complaint, on January 12 and 17, did the FCC begin receiving complaints about the broadcast.

  • Only in two out of the 4,211 email “complaints” did the author admit to having actually seen the program in question, and even those two complaints referred only to the brief, out-of-context segment provided by the PTC on its website. For example, a complaint filed against CBS affiliate KMOV admited that “I did not actually see the show since I usually watch the History Channel or old movies on AMC or FMC or TCM, but I am outraged that our youth are exposed to this. I did watch a clip via the parentstv.org link and was disgusted.”

Special interest groups manipulate the FCC complaint process

  • The American Family Association launched an online campaign against Las Vegas (NBC) and other shows in February and March 2006. As a result, the number of indecency complaints filed at the FCC during February and March 2006 jumped to nearly 140,000, from a typical average of less than 2,000 per month. (2)

  • In February 2005, a PTC campaign launched against a single TV episode of CSI accounted for 89 percent of the total complaints the FCC received that month. (3)


(1) Source: Motion to Vacate Notice of Apparent Liability and Supplement to Opposition of 93 Local Television Broadcast Stations Affiliated with the CBS Television Network (EB-05-IH-0035 before the Federal Communications Commission, 12 June 2006)

(2) Source: FCC Quarterly Report on Informal Consumer Inquiries and Complaints, First Quarter 2006

(3) On its website, the PTC claimed that its members sent 12,971 complaints to the FCC regarding that episode. In the same month, the FCC reported receiving 14,480 complaints overall.

Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy